Reform Era, love and poetry: Júlia Szendrey and Sándor Petőfi

Lectures in English about the Reform Era in the framework of the Petőfi 200 commemorative year

Date: 19 September
Time: 17:00
Venue:  Liszt Institute Brussels
10 Treurenberg, 1000 Brussels

In the framework of the Petőfi 200 commemorative year, three prominent speakers and researchers will explore the relationship between the poet and revolutionary Sándor Petőfi and the poet and writer Júlia Szendrey, and the spirit and legacy of the Reform Era in Hungary. Click here to register for free.

The "Hungarian George Sand" and the "widow of the nation"? The figure of Júlia Szendrey in cultural memory

In 1847, Júlia Szendrey married Sándor Petőfi, the most important Hungarian poet of the era, who, a few months later, in March 1848, played a key role in the outbreak of the Hungarian revolution demanding bourgeois transformation and freedom of the press. Petőfi took an active part both as a poet and as a soldier in the revolution and the following War of Independence of 1848-1849 (separation from the Habsburg Empire) until he disappeared in one of the last battles.

Júlia Szendrey, left alone with their common child, searched for him unsuccessfully for a long time in the following months. In July 1850, she fled her desperate situation into a new marriage to Árpád Horvát, who worked as a university professor.

Most of her contemporaries deeply condemned her action, as they would have expected her to spend the rest of her life in the role of "the nation's widow". The new marriage was evaluated as a rejection of this, a betrayal of her husband and her country. Although by the 1860s she had become a recognized writer (the most significant female poet, writer and translator of the era), only the figure of the muse and the unfaithful wife who threw away the widow's veil was fixed in the cultural memory. Her image until the turn of the century was almost unanimously negative, taking a new direction only then.

Why and how did Júlia Szendrey, considered as a masculine personality in the 19th century, become a symbol of emancipated, modern femininity in the 20th century? Why did she become the "Hungarian George Sand"? The lecture seeks answers to these questions, researching how the great Hungarian and European female roles (muse, writer's wife, blue stockings, eccentric woman, revolutionary woman, femme fatale) are represented in the texts and works about Júlia Szendrey by the authors grouped around the magazine Nyugat, symbol of modernity.

Literary and social historian Emese Gyimesi has been researching the various contexts of Júlia Szendrey's life and literary career since 2009. Since 2012, she has regularly published in various specialized journals, study volumes, and non-fiction magazines. She maintains a research blog and she has published four independent volumes. She edited Júlia Szendrey's previously unpublished literary works and other texts. She obtained her doctorate in literature in 2019 and in history in 2022. She won the Artisjus Literary Award with her monograph "Júlia Szendrey’s literary career - Social historical contexts". She is a staff member of the Institute of History of the Humanities Research Center.

Petőfi, the rule breaker

Petőfi's oeuvre and cult become the origin of Hungarian national literature and even national consciousness, due to the fact that his oeuvre the most fully represents the essence of the change in the cultural model, which made a narrow elitist culture accessible to a wider range of people and thus became an identification base. It is not birth and wealth, but culture that identifies the individual in the larger community (meaning: nation).

Paradoxically, Petőfi's program achieved its unique success by spectacularly and radically violating the norms of the literary culture that prevailed until then. In this lecture, I will try to present some elements of Petőfi's norm-breaking by examining the Petőfi phenomenon itself.

Writer and literary historian Róbert Milbacher was born in 1971 in Kaposvár. He received his doctorate in Szeged in 1999 in 19th century Hungarian literature. He has been a researcher of the era ever since. He has published four books on the subject, among others on the acculturation issues of literary vernacularism, or on János Arany as a cultural construct. He is a teacher at the University of Pécs, but he also regularly publishes contemporary cultural and literary criticism, as well as works of fiction.

"Homeland and progress". What makes the Hungarian Reform Era a reform era?

We often look at the Reform Era from the perspective of the revolution and freedom fight of 1848-1849, thus the misconception sticks to it that its goal was to break away from the Habsburg ruling house. This is a mistake: this last idea only arose during the war of independence and was divisive even then. The real goal of the Reform Era was social reform, the modernization of the country, hand in hand with the elevation of national culture and the idea of liberalism and of freedom.

The concept of the nation acquires a new interpretation from the beginning of the 19th century. It no longer only applied to the elite, the nobility. From then on, the common culture and language formed a cohesive force, spanning denominational and religious boundaries. This is when the national cultural attributes are formed: the anthem, national cuisine, national music, etc.

However, the national idea also appeared among the nationalities that made up more than half of Hungary's population. Therefore, the outstanding thinkers of the Reform Era expected from liberalism and civil equality that the idea of freedom would be able to become more important than nationalism among the Slavs, for example. Unfortunately, this did not happen, and we saw where the dreams of nation-states led us later with the Trianon decision.

To sum up: in the Reform Era underdeveloped conditions prevailed in Hungary. The made it significant was precisely the idea of reform, homeland and progress made. The determined intention to change Hungary's conditions, to create a modern country, a state based on civil equality in which every member of the nation has equal rights. That is why it is called the Reform Era: the age of reforms, when we break away from the old and build a better, new one. The lecture presents these goals and the path leading to them.

The field of research of historian Csaba Katona is the Hungarian social and cultural history of the 19th and 20th centuries. He is the author of several volumes and numerous scientific articles. He majored in History in 1998 from the Faculty of Humanities of Eötvös Loránd University. From that year to 2011 he worked at the Hungarian National Archives in various positions (archivist, head of department, press and program officer, secretary to the director general), while he was responsible editor of the Levéltári Szemle, the Levéltári Közlemények, ArchivNet and Turul, committee member of the Association of Hungarian Archivists and vice-president of the Hungarian Heraldic and Genealogical Society. Between 2011 and 2022, he was a scientific associate of the Humanities Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and from 2013, he was also the communication referent of the Center. Since 2022, he has been working at the Hungarian National Archives. He is member of the board of directors (formerly secretary) of the Hungarian Historical Society, member of the editorial board of Lymbus and Múltkor, vice-president of the Csokonai Vitéz Mihály Literary and Art Society, member of the Modern Russia and Soviet Union Historical Research Group of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Pécs, curator of the Imre Nagy Foundation, and Cultural Ambassador of the City of Balatonfüred. He is a Lecturer at the Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Arts, Szent István University Faculty of Food Science and the Faculty of Central European Studies at Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. He is a permanent historian expert in the Stories from the past of Rádiócafé Millásreggeli.